Changemakers.net Changemakers.net
 
november '06 > view all entries > entry
 •  search  •  about us  •  español  
 


Ending Genocide

Country: United States

Organization: Genocide Intervention Network

2) Focus of activity: Community Involvement

3) Start Year: 2004

4) Positioning in the mosaic of solutions:

  •      Main barrier addressed: Corrupt or inept government and public systems
  •      Main principle addressed: Create alternative systems

    5) Description of initiative: Genocide Intervention Network will change the way the United States and the international community respond to the world's worst crime. The organization's aim is to recruit a committed and diverse group of individuals and communities to form an active network that realizes the "never" in "never again." Members of the Network educate their communities, lobby their elected officials and fundraise directly for civilian protection.

    We are addressing the knowledge, capacity, and especially, the will to fulfill our responsibility to protect.

    A global network of citizens committed to preventing and stopping genocide by themselves and through their government is necessary if we are serious about ending the crime of all crimes. This network would empower citizens to be agents for social change. The educational tool would combat the ignorance about genocide by teaching that genocide is a man-made crisis and can be confronted with a wide toolbox of policies. The advocacy tool would empower citizens with the knowledge on how to leverage their public officials (i.e. with our Darfur Scores) and fund managers to ensure they are not complacent or complicit in genocide. The fundraising tool will provide a direct avenue for citizens to focus on the most important gap in genocide – civilian protection.

    An equally important part of building the first permanent anti-genocide constituency is building social capital. Citizens will bridge and bond with other individuals and groups through their work on Darfur to build a sustainable community committed to a more just and peaceful world – preventing future genocides and mass atrocities.

    Our primary beneficiaries are American citizens and victims of genocide or potential genocide, currently Darfurians.

    6) Description of innovation: GI-Net is mobilizing a global network of citizens who will pressure their governments for increased action against genocide, while simultaneously committing their own dollars to support security efforts in regions like Darfur. This is unprecedented! Our approach is to move beyond the DC insider/elite circles and the tiny human rights constituency and establish widespread (political) support against genocide among ordinary citizens. As David Rieff from the New York Times writes, "Some human rights advocates insist that their only obligation is to document abuses, not to shape government policy or figure out how enforcement can be implemented." In line with Rieff’s charge to reform the existing approach, GI-Net is engaging in straightforward political activism; we are lobbying churches, colleges, and shopping malls in the Midwest as assiduously as we lobby Capitol Hill or large donors such as the Ford Foundation. GI-Net takes its case to the public.

    7) Delivery model: Our outreach relies on on-line and offline channels. Our on-line tactics include our website, email alerts, linking to the blogosphere and popular social networking sites like Facebook, MySpace, Friendster, YouTube, Google Groups. We also pursue the on-line and off-line coverage of the New York Times, PBS, NPR, and smaller media outlets. In addition, we have been privileged to have garnered celebrity support. For example, Angelia Jolie placed an ad for GI-Net in USA Today, Roll Call, The Hill, and People magazine. Also, Mia Farrow mentions GI-Net in TV and radio interviews and during her speaking engagements. Off-line outreach is structured, through our STAND (a student anti-genocide coalition) chapters and Regional Outreach Coordinators, as well as GI-Net members holding events (i.e. showing Hotel Rwanda), knocking on doors, and passing out flyers at other events. GI-Net is also completing a Speakers Bureau to have often-sought speakers educated on GI-Net so they can promote it whenever they speak.

    8) Key operational partnerships: We have tried to form as many partnerships, of varying substance, with as many of the Darfur and human rights groups. At the highest level, GI-Net has incorporated STAND and the Sudan Divestment Taskforce directly into the organization. At a lower level, we coordinate during campaigns, like with Center for American Progress during www.BeAWitness.org, with the Holocaust Memorial Museum for our large-scale conferences, and with Save Darfur during the two major rallies. In the business sector we have partnered with MTV, specifically its college branch mtvU. 3 students, including 2 of our colleagues, teamed up with mtvU and went to refugee camps to make a documentary. Since then we collaborate on nearly every campaign. In the government sector, we have worked closely with officials from the city, state and federal level to pass amendments, legislation, write open letters, and organize press conferences. Since GI-Net fills a particular niche (grassroots political organizing) all these partnerships are critical to our success. We depend on our partners to do their parts so we can succeed in reaching our goals.

    9) Financial model: We have all the necessary financial controls in place to ensure our financial health is secure. Since we are still in the start-up stage, we will begin internal auditing next year. With regards to our financial accountability with supporting civilian protection, we have worked with numerous experts at the World Bank, State Department, Treasury Department, USAID, and humanitarian organizations working in Darfur to establish all the necessary accounting and reporting requirements to ensure our funding is effective.

              • Costs as percentage of income: 5%

              • Financing: We are currently financed through private donations and foundation grants. Some sources include: Omidyar Network/Humanity United, Bridgeway Foundation, Draper Richards Foundation, Echoing Green, US Institute of Peace, Open Society Institute, Breskin Foundation, and Frankel Family Foundation.

    10) Effectiveness

              • Project outcomes: •Raised over $1,500,000, including over $300,000 for civilian protection. •Engaged over 600 colleges and high schools to raise funds and take political action •Organized large-scale lobby days with hundreds of students. In the week of our events, the number of co-sponsors for the legislation for which we lobbied increased by sixty percent. •Successfully organized students to call Senator Lugar’s donors to persuade him to pass the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act. •Successfully got California state to divest its pension plans, the largest in the country, with over $350 billion in combined assets.

              • Number of clients in past year: Tens, if not hundreds, of thousands.

    11) Scaling up strategy

              • Stage of the initiative: Start Up stage.

              • Expansion plan: A lot of our growth depends on the rapidly deteriorating situation in Darfur, Sudan. Regardless of what happens, GI-Net will further develop many of the programs we've recently launched. For example, we will expand the successful Congressional scorecards www.DarfurScores.org to include the Executive Branch and state governments. We will also strengthen our divestment screening tool. Unfortunately, since Darfur will not be the last genocide, GI-Net will use the 3 tools (Educate, Advocate, Donate) to focus on other crisis - either current genocides or potential genocides (i.e. Burma, DR Congo, Côte d'Ivoire). We will also focus on structural changes to genocide. These include mandatory genocide education, enlarging the US peacekeeping budget, and developing a standing rapid reaction force for the UN.

    12) Origin of the initiative: When people hear about genocide in the 21st century, they ask "What can I do?" Instead of feeling helpless and being a bystander, GI-Net provides easy, effective and entertaining ways to have a hand in stopping genocide. (We need to stop genocide out of moral, legal, security, and economic reasons.) The initiative started when I was at Swarthmore College and could not find the answer to "What can I do?” I teamed up with several classmates, researched the reasons for why the world fails repeatedly to stop genocide (see Samantha Power's "A Problem From Hell"), recruited some former policy makers, and created GI-Net.

    Contact Information:
    Mark  Hanis
    Executive Director
    Genocide Intervention Network
    (NGO)
    1333 H Street, NW; Washington, DC 20005
    United States
    Tel: 202-481-8220
    Email: hanis@GenocideIntervention.net
    Website: www.GenocideIntervention.net



    Title for your comment (required):

    Type your comment here:

    Your name, organization and title (required):

    Your email address (required, will not be shown to the public):

    Type the characters you see in the image below.



    Untitled View All Comments:       Post a new comment

    Untitled

    Hanis is shaping public will to protect. Posted December 9 '06, 16:01:00
    Mark Hanis is changing the way ordinary citizens view global affairs. He is showing them how to move from being 'bystanders' to being 'upstanders,' how to move from being unaware to being responsible. His grass-roots efforts have engaged thousands and will help to protect those whose lives are at great danger in Darfur.


    - Ellen J. Kennedy, Ph.D.; Professor, University of St. Thomas


    The Rivers of Peace -please do not ignore their flows Posted December 14 '06, 9:38:39
    (Reply to: "Hanis is shaping public will to protect.")
    Watching an hour of Henry Kissinger interviewed by Charlie Rose on US Public Sector tv Dec 13: the denouement reminded me of what my entrepreneurial journalist father first wrote 30 years ago in a future history : America's 3rd century. He clarified then that if we are going to prevent a networking world of "bombs for everybody", we're going to need radically different rivers of peace than dividing the world by national geo-political boundaries. Kissinger came close to this summing up: the military power of big "democratic" nations will no longer have any correlation with developing peace, far more flows of trust than arms are needed to sustain our race. We are at an extraordinary timewarp where what we do in the next few years will irreversibly improve the wellbeing of everyone, or the exact reverse. Having seen my father start this debate 30 years ago through The Economist, I dare say it is pitiful how little the minds of those now in superpower have questioned or explored it. This communications crisis from and at the top of global decision- making is not any one person's fault but it demonstrates the mother of all failures to see system wholes before parts. The spreadsheet was indeed computing's killer application but not in the way that Gates' meant. Drowning managers and top people in numbers whose lifeless valuation standard betrays us all through utter lack of groundedness and a lost love of nature's and human's diversity.

    When I reached my teens, my maths teacher spent a week getting us to read -and participate in - a story of flatland. This was a world where all the most powerful people did not know how to integrate, they added and separated what needed to be multiplied and connected. They applauded yesterdays' scores, paying themselves big performance bonuses, denying the maths of gathering storms and the gravity of compound consequences. Everyone lower down suffered and indeed (tacitly and emotionally) knew better than the top people that every map of the biggest organisations was at extreme risk of having gone productively and demandingly out of sync. Then came Stern reports from high places like Her Majesty's Treasury this fall - our compound errors are breaching the last tipping point- if we now invest 1% of all we have in a wholly different direction we may just save 20% or is it 100%? The book left the question open to any teenage student of maths- would all the peoples find the way out in time or would all the flows of nature and of human systems collapse (ending sustainability)? It was also a perfect book to explain why those who have never got as far in maths as calculus literally cannot value the compound consequences of systems correctly however many computers or spreadsheets they have on their laps. Nor can they ask the right questions of their advisers- the skillings and easy lays who go to war on talent and corrupt people blindly or knowingly, banning investment in people in favour of the prejudice of owning machines.

    INTEGRATION THE NUMBER 1 DNA OF ENTREPRENEURS This must also be relevant here. How? Well I do not find the peace mosaic of much value in terms of rivers of peace. Look whose lifetime works - tidal waves for peace - are not simply mapped on it. In Ashoka's global academy you have at least 3 wondrous dimensions for flowing peace: Eigen's end corruption all over the world: Yunus Nobel grassroots economic development towards peace: Grajews: empower 100000 world citizen meetings across borders. You could start with these rivers and a 4th all other - and see which of the mosaic projects and competition entries connect with which river flow. Undoubtedly as you reviewed others, you would find other world peace entrepreneur dimensions not yet represented at global academy level, nor in seeing how Ashoka's 2000 members connect along river banks or @ intersection flows. These missing www guides include: grassroots energy supplies (both for machines and people, aka Wangari's climate which Grajew's Kenya's world social forum in January was a don't miss now opportunity to train 100000 people around not just a 1000 Gores); million child schooling knowhow: since if we do not seed cross-cultural peace at such communal spaces we have failed to learn the greatest gift inherited from Gandhi and Montessori; justice where change is compounding fastest: it's a shame that Ashoka's lead on this into China is not apparently connected with Jagdish Gandhi's international leadership of chief justice nets out of India.

    There is a system pattern rule that Einstein and Gandhi may well have originated though I find it's now clearest in more recent writings of Ackoff and Buckminster Fuller. As worldwide networking technology accelerates how all our sustainabilities depend on harmoniously transforming to higher order integration, then beware of the tragedy wherein the harder specialists of the lower order system work on what they care most about (without flowing into each others' passions of care) the more they distant us from making the sustainable transformation in time.

    FALLIBILITY AGE Assuming that the hosts of changemakers do wholly understand systemic entrepreneurship, I hope to see Eigen, Grajew and Yunus quickly review what in the mosaic and the competition is related to their flows, then the interaction of their flows, then who else's flows need to be in the Global Academy. Otherwise, the competition of micro-experts of different pieces of peace will be one of the most misleading sources of information or action ever to have branded itself with the maps of entrepreneurship that I trust we all know -be we strategists, economists, people of deep ethical gravity or cross-cultural freedom lovers - flowed from alumni of the late 1700s Scot Adam Smith.

    chris.macrae@ yahoo.co.uk http://clubofscotland.com


    - macrae.tv ditto ditto



  •   Return to Home Page


    español   •   about us   •   contact us   •   judges  •   
    Changemakers Web search
    Copyright © 2007 Changemakers   •   Legal & Privacy Policy