Statistics illustrate these teachers' experiences on a broader scale. In the
1980's, only 55 to 58 percent of elementary students in Brazil were
promoted to
the next grade. Repetition rates were between 35 and 38 percent, while
drop-out
rates fluctuated between 6 and 8 percent1.
Such figures draw a picture of the
educational experiences of those tenacious students who manage to complete
their schooling despite the odds.
More Schools Need More (and Better) Teachers
Brazil's national government, together with international development
agencies,
has devoted a considerable amount of effort (and money) to improving the
educational system with a sharp focus on literacy, a primary indicator of a
country's development. As a result, access to primary education has
drastically increased. From 1970 to 1994, enrollment of children between the
ages of 7 and 14 increased from 67 percent to 96 percent. Primary school
graduation rates doubled between 1980 and 1994, to 24 percent2.
Much of these
improvements were due to a proliferation of schools indisputably a
good
thing.
But the increase in the demand for teachers brought with it an inevitable
decline in standards.
The teachers flowing into today's rapid expansion in the school system are
products of yesterday's problematic schools, in which the average pupil took
12.2 years to complete nine years of schooling. Because star pupils in
developing countries tend to make the most of the business opportunities
their
countries' development has created, the sad fact is that these teachers were
often students who did not perform sufficiently well to go into law, medicine
or engineering.
Their educational experiences have been characterized by failure and
repetition. The result is far from being a love of learning; school was
something they had to endure. And now society expects them to engage their
students in learning so much more than they themselves ever absorbed. What
are
the chances that students will develop a love for literature if they are
taught
by people who have difficulty reading simple novels? Or become interested in
their national history if their teachers have never visited
nearby historical sites?
'Competency' A Euphemism for
'Mediocrity'?
Britain has adopted a model of teacher training in which teacher-trainees
must master no fewer than 90 separate "competencies" during their training. The Brazilian Ministry of Education took a similar path by instituting National Core Curriculum Standards, among other steps. In one of its first moves, the
Ministry sent each of 600,000 teachers 10 books explaining the new standards
and how to teach them. But how helpful will these reference books be to
teachers like those in the Luiz Friere reading circle?
These programs place sole emphasis on facts to be memorized, and nothing
on how
to teach them in an engaging way. In reducing learning to memorization, such
education fails to promote the ability to think analytically, to
understand, to
apply one's knowledge to the world, to seek knowledge throughout life.
Jude Collins, professor of teacher training at Ulster University in Northern
Ireland, says the problem with competency-based curriculums is that "learning
becomes a matter of being able to perform certain tasks efficiently, and so
does teaching. And the importance of looking at a wider horizon the
relationship between what's being taught and social matters, political
matters,
matters of value and worth become not just beside the point, but not
even thought about."
In order to engage students in learning, the teachers themselves must be
engaged in learning.
In short, these attempts to improve education fall short because they fail to
see teachers as individuals, fail to provide experiences that make teachers
eager consumers of culture, and thus cultural emissaries to their
students. In
Collins's words, "The term 'competency' stinks of a devotion to the mediocre,
to the functional." Teachers need more than rote technique; they need to
fundamentally understand and appreciate the subjects they are teaching,
and how they are related to the world around them.
Three Programs That Work
Enter the social entrepreneur. Social entrepreneurs distinguish themselves by
lending a different perspective to chronic problems. Where a society has
reached a consensus that education must improve, social entrepreneurs
excel in
innovative answers to "how to" questions.
This issue of the Changemakers.net journal examines three programs that
create
new paradigms in teacher training. They have realized that the role of
being a
teacher involves much more than imparting facts. Successful teachers do more
than teach their students how to read, to solve math problems, to memorize
historical facts. Rather, they instill a life-long love of learning and an
irrevocable quest for knowledge.
Just as good teaching is a rather elusive principle, so is teacher training.
National educational standards, increases in teachers salaries and more
training in technique these steps fail to address the teachers' core
need: to be well rounded individuals who seek out knowledge to understand the
world around them.
Answering the 'How to' Question
What began as a reading club in Recife, Brazil, has become a multi-faceted
learning experience for close to 3,000 educators in 865 schools. The
participants still celebrate the first "big book" (i.e., novel) that a group
completes, but the program is not limited to reading. Through learning more
about the teachers' lives and challenges, staff members have
been able to nurture other aspects of the participants' personas. Teachers go
on field trips to nearby historical sites; they ask artists to explain their
work while giving a tour of a local museum; they go backstage before a
play and
learn about the genesis of a theatrical work. The predictable by-product
is a
enthusiasm that the teachers cannot help but impart to their students.
Also in Brazil, Silvia Caravalho is working with pre-school teachers. A
traditionally neglected area, their training has focused on basic child care,
with no attention paid to early childhood development. Now she uses the arts
extensively to stimulate the teacher-trainees and expose them to a side of
culture that had previously been a mystery to most.
Silvia has also altered the training syllabus to include self-reflection as a
principle ingredient. Rather than just being lectured for hours on didactics,
teachers-in-training are taught how to learn from their classroom
experiences,
to discuss problems and brainstorm solutions with colleagues.
Our third article comes from South Africa, where Cynthia Mpati has
developed a
correspondence course that provides rural teachers, a previously unserved
sector, with access to quality professional development. South Africa has
relatively high illiteracy (estimated at 15 million adults,3),
and suffers many
problems similar to Brazil's in terms of teaching efficacy. A great number of
teachers lack certification and, historically, school administrators took
advantage of them. Cynthia has been able to empower teachers through periodic
on-site trainings in her center, together with the ongoing correspondence
learning.
There appears to be no better way to invest in a country's future than by
improving education, the heart of development. Unfortunately, reform programs
generally fall short because they fail to address effectively the most
important component of education the human factor. The adage holds
true:
Better teachers make better students. The three programs profiled here
realize that making better teachers requires more than training them in
"competencies."
Rather, teacher training needs to develop teachers as thinking individuals
who appreciate the world around them. Only then can they pass on a love of
learning to their students.