Changemakers.net Changemakers.net
features
oct '05 / jan '06 > feature
 •  search  •  about us  •  español  
 

    Lessons from Fire Mountain:
Managing Danger and Strengthening Community

By Pritha Sen

A volcanologist by profession, Ashoka Fellow Eko Teguh Paripurno has become better known for his multiple roles as a counselor, trainer, and researcher Eko Teguh Paripurno for communities that have been affected by natural disasters—volcanic eruptions, floods, forest fires, landslides and earthquakes—or that have the potential to suffer from such natural disasters. At the core of Teguh's work lies community-based disaster risk management and the firm belief that communities—the main actors and primary beneficiaries—are the key resource in managing disaster.

At present, Teguh is campaigning for a national law on disaster management. His ideas and practices in this field have continued to develop over the years and are now viewed as a reference by many groups throughout Indonesia.

Teguh started work in 1994 through his organization, Kappala, by training communities near the Mount Merapi volcano on Indonesia's large island of Java, which has one of the highest population densities in the world. Merapi has erupted 68 times since 1548, and in a 1930 blast it killed more than 1,000 people.

Merapi volcano Merapi volcano

The most recent series of eruptions began in 1987 and 1994. Merapi's dome collapsed, sending a plume six miles high and generating rock and ash flows and surges that extended up to five miles from the summit. This caused fires and evacuation of more than 6,000 people.


"We Need a Holistic Paradigm for Disaster Risk Management"

Teguh helped communities near Merapi, as well as other communities at high risk of natural disaster, prepare for, respond to, and recover quickly from natural disasters. At the same time, he started working with local governments to change their attitudes and policies regarding natural resource management in order to prevent future disasters that result from the misuse of resources. He advocates "risk management" to prevent disasters caused by misuse of natural resources.

Teguh continues to spread his ideas and practices on disaster management at the local level in regions throughout Indonesia with varying characteristics. He provides training in community-based disaster risk management (CBDRM).

At the national level, he has worked with an expert team, People Concerned About Natural Disasters, to draft a law for regulating disaster management that will be introduced in Indonesia's parliament. He is hopeful that the draft will soon be completed and approved. At the regional level, he is active in the ASEAN Disaster Risk Reduction Network (ADRRN).


"The People are the Lead Actors"

Teguh's larger goal is campaigning to establish CBRDM as an entirely new discipline to allow communities at risk to study the problem and for practical application. "Disaster Management must apply a holistic paradigm of disaster risk management," Teguh said. "This paradigm views a disaster as a phenomenon that is not separated from life, and is not always simply a problem. The emphasis therefore is on prevention efforts, preparedness, and a proactive attitude. And all efforts of disaster management—prevention, mitigation, response, or recovery—must begin with the government and the people at the front line."

Teguh's CBDRM approach has evolved to allow local communities to initiate and maintain development themselves. It acknowledges that there is a relationship between disaster risk management and the development process. The main strategy is to increase the capacity and resources of the most vulnerable groups, and tp reduce their vulnerability in order to prevent future disasters.





Components of Risk Management

  • Do political officials have a strong commitment to reducing the risk of disaster?
  • Are the designated officials very effective in providing strategic services?
  • Are the service providers skilled, competent, and able to carry out their role and responsibilities?
  • Is the reduction of disaster integrated into sectoral and general development policy?
  • Is there a framework of policy and laws that is known and understood by the public and that gives clear direction related for land use, building, institutions and systems for planning as well as for collective operating (synergy)?
  • Is there a policy framework that provides guidance to planning mitigation and emergency response at every level?
  • Is there a strong institutional framework that is integrated both horizontally and vertically into the decision-making process, planning and operating?
  • Is there an educational program and societal awareness centered upon information about dangers in general and the scenario of risks to people specifically?
  • Is disaster risk management part of school curricula?
  • And is it incorporated into other institutions of learning?
  • Is there the same standard for competency based training that is accredited?
  • Are there strong networks (multi-stakeholders) that provide opportunities to identify new issues as they appear (e.g., relocation, agriculture, water, health) and to maintain the best methods?
  • Is there an official risk management process that provides the results of studies of dangers and analysis of risks that are comprehensive and consistent?
  • Is there an evaluation of technical risks that has been translated so that it can be easily used by service providers and communities?
  • Do the people have good access to information and directions about disaster risks (through basic data, websites, libraries, education system, etc.)?
  • In regions where disasters strike frequently, do community networks function well?
  • Is community participation in identifying, planning, and handling risks very high?
  • Is there a network of experts (from university, church, traditional communities, etc.) across disciplines (physics, social, cultural, etc.) that has good relations with the government and civil society?
  • Are the print and electronic media completely engaged in promoting the issue of disaster management and mitigation?
  • Are there insurance, loan, or credit institutions from the government and small-scale credit schemes that support homeowners and small-scale business people to undertake mitigation efforts?
  • Is there emergency response planning that includes: 1) effective coordination and information management, 2) effective detection and warning systems, 3) effective systems to alert and mobilize people, 4) the ability to activate and mobilize key people and appropriate resources, 5) the ability to inventory resources including reserves, transportation infrastructure, funds, and emergency relief, (6) activists to hold briefings, debriefings, and reporting, 7) detailed information about reviews and validation of operational activities.
  • Is there a Center of Emergency Operations with both a good outreach system and a network for communication?
  • Is there an emergency response plan and sustainable efforts to maintain regulations that cover service provision in accordance with specific tasks and responsibilities, and protection of staff and materials that guarantees work will continue?
  • Is there a strategy and practice for reducing poverty that is programmed and shows positive results (e.g., sustainability/sovereignty of food, sustainable control of assets and access to natural resources for the sustainability of life and water resources, etc.)?
 
CBDRM must produce overall improvements in both the environment and community residents' quality of life, Teguh says. This approach (see "See Components of Risk Management" at right) tackles the fundamental causes of man-made disasters: poverty, discrimination, marginalization, weak government programs, poor political and economic management, and mismanagement of natural resources.

For example, in May this year Teguh was actively campaigning against the Indonesian government's pro-industry mining policy. Ninety-two petitioners had filed a lawsuit against the policy and called upon the expertise of two academics and a former minister to support their arguments.

As a member of the Mining Advocacy Network, Teguh was one of two academics who warned about impacts in terms of disasters such as floods, landslides, drought, and dam sedimentation. He warned that forest destruction caused by mining also causes social disasters due to the loss of assets that should belong to local communities.


"Disasters Today are Caused More by Misuse of Natural Resources"

Teguh's scope of work widened further after the massive Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami that hit Nanggroe, Aceh, Darussalam, and North Sumatra provinces in Indonesia on December 26, 2004. Teguh advocates maintaining natural shields such as mangrove forests or even concrete structures along disaster-prone coastal areas. "While most disasters are related to the earth and geology, there is now a trend where the relation to geology is small and it is more about the exploitation of natural resources, the failure of technology, and of the environment," he notes.

CBDRM is a dynamic, evolving framework and Teguh is integrating lessons learned from existing practices into this theory. He encourages CBDRM practitioners and communities to share their experiences, methodologies, and tools. But he also acknowledges that different communities may have differing perceptions of risks and how to manage them, and says it is important to recognize these differences (see graphic below).

Once CBDRM is recognized as a strategic need, it will be supported only when communities are allowed to exercise power, Teguh said. This requires the following strategic choices: 1) advocate disaster management as a part of daily life and governance; 2) encourage enforcement of disaster management laws; 3) improve the institutional disaster management regulations; 4) formulate basic mechanisms and; 5) implement key programs in disaster risk reduction.

At the samet time, Teguh advocates measures such as restoring livelihoods, integrating disaster reduction in development policies, and setting up procedures for dealing with various forms of threats in accordance with the cycle of disaster management. Land-use planning is critical. He also stresses the importance of making disaster management part of school curricula.


Pritha Sen is a Delhi-based development consultant and freelance journalist. She is the executive editor of Small Change, a microbusiness monthly.


From Changemakers.net's October 2001 issue:

Indonesia, the world's most earthquake-prone country, is frequented by natural disasters, ranging from volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and tidal waves, to floods, mudslides and severe droughts. Typically, the Indonesian government has responded to disasters by evacuating the affected communities, and later attempting to force them to migrate to another region of the country – rather than planning ahead for disasters and training residents to be prepared.

Since the Merapi volcano in central Java erupted in 1994, volcanologist Eko Teguh Paripurno has sought a better way, by training communities near the volcano – and other communities at high risk of natural disaster – to prepare for, respond to, and recover quickly from natural disasters. While numerous reports have criticized the Indonesian government's response to disasters, Teguh, age 39, has launched the first organization to help affected communities manage disasters and recover.

At the same time, Teguh is working with local governments to change their attitudes and policies regarding natural resource management, in order to prevent future disasters that result from the misuse of resources. He is advocating "risk management" to prevent disasters caused by misuse of natural resources.

When Teguh was elected an Ashoka Fellow in November 2000, Indonesia's most prestigious news magazine Tempo carried a report entitled "Make Friends with Disasters, a la Teguh" (teguh literally means "perseverance" in the Indonesian language.) Teguh now works through the Center for the Study of Disasters at the University of National Development Veteran (UPN) in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, promoting his Disaster Research and Education Program (DreaM). Kappala, the first organization he established, is now part of this program.

   

Merapi Speaks

After participating in search and rescue activities for victims of the November 22, 1994 eruption of Merapi, Teguh and some of his friends visited survivors and documented the human toll of the disaster. Merapi means "Fire Mountain." It is the most volatile volcano on Indonesia's large island of Java, which – with 600 people per square kilometer – has one of the highest population densities in the world.

Merapi has erupted 68 times since 1548. One of the worst blasts was in 1930, when more than 1,000 people were killed. Because of Merapi's violent past and its location just 20 miles north of the city of Yogyakarta (population 3 million), it is classified one of the world's "Decade Volcanoes" by the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior, which means it requires special study.

Merapi has the unfortunate distinction of producing more nuee ardentes than any other volcano on Earth. This refers to highly heated masses of gas-charged ash that are expelled by a volcano with explosive force and move at hurricane speeds up to 70 mph down the mountainside like glowing avalanches.

Nuee ardentes occur when the lava dome at the summit of a mountain collapses. Merapi's lava dome is much like the dome inside Mount St. Helens in Washington State.

The most recent series of eruptions began in 1987. Merapi's dome collapsed in November 1994, sending a plume six miles high and generated rock and ash flows and surges that extended up to five miles from the summit. This caused fires and evacuation of more than 6,000 people.

Merapi volcano erupts Merapi volcano erupts

Afer the eruption, Teguh counted 92 victims: 68 died and one person was never recovered. Many of the injured suffered severe burns from the hot gases. With his friends, Teguh compiled a moving pocket book entitled Merapi Bertutur, or "Merapi Speaks," published with help from Oxfam on the fifth year anniversary of the disaster, November 22, 1999.


Visiting Villages, Scaling Summits

Teguh chose to study geology at university because he knew that it would allow him to pursue his love of the outdoors. As a student, he was a leader in nature lovers' and mountaineering clubs. After Teguh graduated with a major in volcanology, he and several friends helped established the Community of Nature Lovers and Environment Watchers (KAPPALA) – an organization devoted to defending the environment and strengthening community participation in this effort.

Teguh lives with his wife, Ninuk Retno Raras, a conservationist and writer, and two sons in a northern section of Yogyakarta, less than 15 miles from Mt. Merapi. A muscular and strong man by Javanese standards, Teguh found that when he climbed the summits of volcanic mountains that span the length of Java, he preferred spending time in the village communities along the way.

When the mountain erupted in 1994, Teguh and KAPPALA participated in search and rescue operations. They recognized the many shortcomings of the government's disaster relief programs.

Despite the scope and number of potential disasters in Indonesia, the Indonesian government does not plan in advance for disasters, does not provide adequate early warning systems, and does not prepare Merapi volcano infrastructure to efficiently and effectively respond to the disasters. Without this advance planning, the focus of the Indonesian government's response to natural disasters has always been emergency relief and evacuation.

Traditionally, the government evacuates all communities that are affected, or might be affected, by a natural disaster regardless of the different circumstances in each disaster. They are relocated to temporary barracks for several months, often without adequate food and water or resources to earn an income.

In some cases, individuals are then relocated to nearby towns and given a house but no land to farm, even though farming has always been their source of livelihood. In other cases, individuals are relocated to other islands and given a piece of land, but often this land is too small or of poor quality.

The government unilaterally decides which areas should be evacuated, with no input from local communities or community organizations. The result is that evacuations are not targeted and are usually much broader than necessary. This uniform approach to disaster relief, regardless of the nature of the disaster, fails to take into account communities' different needs and the potential for the people to return to, and repair, their home areas.


Resource Management or Exploitation?

Compounding Indonesia's vulnerability to natural disasters, human misuse of resources is often the cause of environmental damage that leads to the disasters. While academics have discussed the importance of better resource management techniques by local governments, there has been little focus on changing the attitudes and policies of local governments toward resource management.

For example, hillside forests that are overly cut can result in damaging mudslides. Topsoil degraded by years of chemical fertilizer and pesticide use becomes porous and is easily swept away by erosion.

Coral reefs that protect coastal areas from flooding are destroyed when dynamite is used for fishing. Roads built along beaches to promote tourism disturb the natural balance of fragile sand dune ecosystems.

Merapi volcano Merapi volcano

Government policies do not protect or limit the use of natural resources in order to prevent these kinds of natural disasters. Government officials view the resources as expendable commodities that are valuable for their use and benefits, but do not take into account the fact that resource degradation can cause disasters that are costly and disruptive to communities.


Mountain Wisdom

Some 50,000 people live on the southwest flank of the volcano. Teguh calculates there are more than 1,200 inhabitants living in 30 hamlets within the inner circle of the volcano. The closest houses are less than six kilometers from the crater at about 5,000 feet above sea level.

The inhabitants work as farmers, cultivating fertile soil that supports terraces of tobacco, tea and coffee plants, neat plots of carrots, cabbages, beans and peas, wild raspberries, and clove and banana trees. "We can see hot clouds and hear small eruptions almost every day," Teguh noted.

The inhabitants all know that the Merapi volcano is very dangerous, yet many are determined to stay on the mountain, for their livelihood depends on it. Teguh believes inhabitants who have lived next to the volcano all their lives must have developed some local wisdom to cope with eruptions and survive them. He believes they can manage the danger, and make use of the critical events that disasters often bring.

"It is very sad to lose a husband, a wife, children, livestock and houses," he said. "But it is worse to lose a memory, and not to learn anything from what has happened."

Medical training Training for emergency treatment, using local medications

In 1995, following the eruption, Teguh began training the inhabitants of two villages on the volcano's slope in disaster management and preparedness. He found many had ignored past warnings by military government officials.

The people were alienated from the government because of its policies of forcing people in development projects and disaster-prone areas to relocate or "transmigrate" to distant places. The western slope of the volcano had been emptied following an eruption in the early 1960s when the inhabitants were forced to transmigrate by the government.

"It doubled the suffering of the people," Teguh said. "In addition to losing loved ones and properties, they were forced to leave their home and birth place."

For the remaining residents on the southern, eastern and northern slopes, years of government persuasion have failed. "These volcano dwellers have enjoyed living here for generations," Teguh noted. "Some of them even live very close to the hot smoke."


Five Stages of Disaster Management

Nearly every other weekend, Teguh, his wife Raras, and their two boys, Galih (11 years) and Gandar (7 Eko Teguh's sons years) visit communities around the volcano to make people aware of the mountain's eruptive moods, and help them to be ready for them. They have become accepted as friends, if not honorary family members of the villagers on Merapi.

They travel in an old jeep Teguh calls "Rhino," for the steel beast has the rhino's endurance for running through muddy mountain terrain. Teguh is known here as a simple, friendly man. "People wave their hands and greet us when they see our jeep passing," Raras said.

Teguh teaches village residents and community organizations a five-stage system of disaster early-warning, rapid-response, reconstruction, prevention and preparation. For each of these stages, Teguh works to draw out and incorporate the local community's knowledge and practices regarding disaster response.

Merapi and Rhino Merapi volcano with "Rhino" in the foreground

In the past, the government's program of community never reached the common people who faced the threat of eruptions. Government courses were offered only to district officials, and almost always dealt with irrelevant topics.

"The village chiefs were trained to give search and rescue instruction, while people need to know what sorts of precautions and preventive steps should be taken," said an inhabitant of Turgo village.

The first stage of Teguh's training involves helping communities document and utilize traditional, community-based, early-warning signals to foresee impending disasters. Teguh found the villagers didn't like the sound of an electronic bell set up by government as a warning system.

Traditionally, many communities have relied on beating hollow tree trunks to warn each other of impending floods. Teguh found they still prefer to use bamboo or wooden instruments.


Dealing with the Steam

Teguh also helps communities develop evacuation systems that respond rapidly to natural disasters, rather than wait for government action. "By improving our alert system, and our skill to manage disasters, communities can empower themselves to deal with the steamy Merapi," he said.

The second stage involves helping community members return to their community, if possible, to assess the damage and potential for repair, to begin repair of homes, and to search for livestock. While many members of the community may be afraid to return, Teguh helps communities' regain their psychological strength. He restores a sense of solidarity by helping communities organize cultural expositions that re-establish a sense of community and the value of tradition.

In the third stage, Teguh encourages communities to begin rebuilding the social system and infrastructures – that is, to rebuild roads and dams, test the water, choose new local leaders to help adapt to the new circumstances, and reestablish connections between neighbors.

This can be a lengthy process, in which villagers are unlikely to benefit from government resources. Thus, Teguh encourages communities to develop strategies that enlist and encourage cooperation between those who have been affected less by the disaster, and those who have suffered more.

Midwife training Midwives training in Mageleang ("Rhino" on left)

The fourth stage involves a range of prevention activities that differ, depending on the kind of natural disaster a community may face. Teguh helps identify possible disaster-prone areas, and helps the community develop methods for preventing or limiting the impact of a disaster.

This includes a combination of community activity and government advocacy. For example, in a flood-prone area, the community is involved in building retaining walls or raising houses. In a village near potential volcanic activity, the community works together to build a road to expedite evacuation.

Teguh also encourages local community members and organizations to research their area and the potential for disaster. Too often, outsiders who do not know the land and surrounding environment conduct this type of research. Government policy often is then based on the research of such outside "experts."

Key to Teguh's work is involving communities in research and planning, then advocacy to local governments so they develop policies and laws based on real needs. An example: local residents of a village helped improve the government's plans for a watershed management project by gathering and presenting data about their area.


Be Prepared

The fifth stage involves training communities to prepare for future disasters. Community members are trained in emergency medical techniques, alternative sources of communications, evacuation, and other activities.

Teguh is helping implement this system by training community members and organizations within the community, who can then go out and train other community members. He wants the local community organizations to lead and organize these efforts.

Teguh also is working with, and training, members of environmental protection and farmers' networks, such as WALHI (Indonesia Forum for the Environment) and JARNOP (organizations working with farming groups). He also has developed a range of publications that are distributed widely to environmental and farming groups, as well as to local governments.

Teguh recognizes that while this community-based system of disaster response is critical to providing real and effective assistance and recovery, it is also critical for local governments to change the way they manage natural resources and the environment, to prevent future natural disasters. For this reason, he is advocating that local governments incorporate proper resource management in their policy decision-making process, to prevent disasters.

Teguh believes that local government officials must be provided with information and be made aware of the potential consequences of environmental policies. He is focusing on local government officials because the decentralization that followed the fall of the Soeharto regime has put these types of policy decisions into their hands. He believes it is critical to educate and influence these officials while they are new to this kind of policymaking.

Shortly before Indonesia's military government collapsed in 1998, Teguh trained families in 17 villages. Merapi erupted the day after Teguh and his friends had conducted a disaster simulation drill. Fortunately, the villagers memory was still fresh from the drill. They went about their tasks calmly and survived the eruptions.


Creating a Track Record

When Teguh began his work, the office of the government volcano observatory was not very happy with him. Government officials suspected KAPPALA was fomenting distrust and disrespect for the government's authority to manage response to volcanoes.

But the results of Teguh's work have given him a favorable reputation. He now is known as a counselor for communities that have been affected by natural disasters – including volcanoes, floods, forest fires, landslides and earthquakes – or that have the potential to suffer from such natural disasters. As a naturalist, Teguh is interested in biodiversity conservation programs, and disaster management courses for coastal areas.

"I keep working behind the screen, encouraging local communities to be aware of their own advantages when they live in troublesome areas," he said. He has worked on a food security project in which he helped fishermen plant water melon on the beach, where sand makes the soil fertile – making use of the period when there is no tsunami or hurricanes.

Food security training Eko Teguh during a food security training

Teguh has helped communities draw-up their own maps of areas susceptible to threats from landslides and floods. During this past year, he helped people construct bunkers, and encouraged them to utilize radio communications.

Some of these people have volunteered to work as volcano watchers, and have stationed themselves in a position that is much closer to the mouth of the volcano than the conventional posts guarded by government officials. People are now better informed, and are no longer treated as objects by authorities when disaster threatens.

Since the fall of the Suharto regime, the reformed government administrations recognize Teguh's expertise. He is invited to facilitate workshops and training in various disaster-prone districts.

Urip Bahagia, the chief government officer in charge of evacuation, said Teguh's style is different from the government's approach. "The government tends to provide people with orders, while Eko Teguh and his friends emphasize the need for counseling," he said.

Bahagia said that non-governmental organizations (NGOs) such as Teguh's KAPPALA have tended to create conflicts among communities, especially when government officials have ordered people to abandon an area, and NGO activists encourage them to stay.

"Some people, including village chiefs, were in favor of Eko Teguh's approach," Bahagia said. "But many were loyal to the instructions given by authorities. Fortunately, we are now realizing that counseling is more acceptable."

The government now conducts two types of training and receives numerous requests for training from communities living in disaster prone areas, said Sonny Suarsono, an officer with Social Affairs. "We conduct two types of training," he said. "The first one is a managerial level training given to village officials and public figures. The second one is for task force staffs, and is followed by training for ten-day classes of 40 persons. Eko Teguh is very well accepted here. I feel he has a perfect methodology to offer."

Suarsono said he believes that people should be encouraged to take initiative on their own, and not just wait for orders from the government. Teguh is an excellent trainer, he added.

"He knows many different types of natural disasters, and he has a lot of management models for dealing with them. He woke people up shortly after midnight and trained them about what to do in case a landslide occurs."

This particular training included instruction in first aid, opening a public kitchen, and a pioneering of search and rescue training. "People enjoy the simulation and the interactive methods introduced by KAPPALA," Suarsono said. "It is really needed, and very good."


How to Live in Dangerous Places

Government authorities have invited Teguh to give many different training sessions and drills during the past two years. As result, communities around Merapi are more conscious now than ever before, Bahagia said.

While in the past, many ignored authorities' warnings when an alert condition was raised, today people are ready to collect their valuables and foods, as necessary, Bahagia said. "Eko Teguh and his friends brought us a new paradigm – how to live in dangerous places."

Teguh has become a nationally-known facilitator for refugees and potential victims of natural disasters. He conducts workshops on many other islands of Indonesia with the sponsorship of the UN High Commission on Refugees and Oxfam.

When Teguh was elected an Ashoka Fellow in late November 2000, Indonesia's most prestigious news magazine, Tempo, hailed him with a two-page report entitled "Make Friends with Disasters, a la Teguh" (teguh literally means "perseverance" in the Indonesian language.)


Needs:

Contributions of relief supplies are needed for people in disaster areas because the current rainy season is causing mudslides and flooding.


Contact:

KAPPALA Indonesia
Perumahan Kepuh Permai D.27
Wedomartani, Ngemplak
Yogyakarta Yogyakarta 55584
Indonesia
Tel: (62) 274 870323
Fax: (62) 274 870323

 
Swati Lal
E-mail: swatilal@hotmail.com


Reporting by Eka Budianta with editing by Kris Herbst, Changemakers Webmaster


Read more articles on this topic:
Go to the Changemakers Library for selected Internet resources about Meeting Disaster: Before, During, and After










 

  Home Page


español   •   about us   •   contact us   •   judges  •   
Changemakers Web search
Copyright © 2007 Changemakers   •   Legal & Privacy Policy