Changemakers.net Changemakers.net
   <   >
  Journal
  January '04
 
 •  search  •  about us  •  español  
 









How to Change the World Available now through Amazon.com

Read book review
by Chris Cusano

 
Interview: David Bornstein
"How to Change the World"

David Bornstein, a journalist who specializes in writing about social innovation, is the author of a new book,
David Bornstein David Bornstein
How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas, that willl be released by Oxford University Press on Feb. 5. He has authored articles in the New York Times and the Atlantic Monthly; he co-wrote the PBS documentary "To Our Credit"; and his first book The Price of a Dream: The Story of the Grameen Bank (University of Chicago Press, 1997) was selected as a finalist for the New York Public Library Book Award for Excellence.

During the late 1990s, while many journalists focused on the technology boom, Bornstein traveled to far-flung destinations on four continents, chronicling the world-changing emergence of the global citizen sector and the social entrepreneurs who are its leading innovators.

"Almost everyone knows about the explosion of the dot-coms — a much smaller phenomenon — but millions have still not heard the big story: the worldwide explosion of dot-orgs," Bornstein writes. Now, after twelve years writing about social entrepreneurs, he has developed a unique knowledge of this exciting and fast-growing field.

Bornstein lives in New York City with his wife, Abigail, and his son, Elijah.

Changemakers: You must be feeling good that the publication of How to Change the World is coinciding with an historical moment when social entrepreneurship is emerging all over the planet, and the general public is just waking up to the fact that this is both a powerful force and a viable career choice.

Bornstein: Social entrepreneurship is really accelerating. It's taking off with such a vengeance. It's a quantum leap from where it was even three or four years ago. I started working on this book in 1998. A friend of mine said, "It's amazing that something that you have been working on for five years can seem so timely when it comes out." I feel like I bought a stock when it was cheap and the price has gone up, and I'm still holding it.

CM: Are you getting positive reactions from the "average man or woman in the street?"

DB: Yes, the awareness of social entrepreneurship is spreading. In recent weeks I have had conversations with business people, students, human resources people, people in religious organizations, and others. Each group is finding that these changes are very important for their constituencies to understand.

CM: And how are they reacting?

DB: In some cases there's a sense of surprise — even wonderment. The first sort of thing I hear from people who have read the book and previously know nothing about this field is, "Hey, why have I never heard about any of this stuff?" And then, "Where can I learn more about it?"

CM: The news media has been slow to catch on to this. For example, you note that most Americans recognize the name of Jack Welch, the former GE CEO, but only one in a thousand can identify Jim Grant despite the fact that he is listed in Encyclopedia Britannia as a man whose work has played a major role in saving 25 million children's lives. The People of the Century List included many writers, entrepreneurs, and heads of state, but Jim Grant, who you write about in the book, is not on the list.

You suggest some reasons for this: successful journalists learn to approach business, society and government with a critical, skeptical attitude, and they are wary of appearing to advocate a particular position. Further, they believe they are more vulnerable when they put out a positive story. Finally, because the citizen sector is a newly emerging force in the world, the media hasn't yet recognized that it deserves the same degree of coverage as business or politics. You note that there is always a lag time between when a change occurs and when there is a major response to it. You mention that the New York Times only inaugurated its "Business Day" in 1978.

DB: What is the image of the world that the average person gets? Think of the diet of information that they intake. You could read the newspapers every day for 10 or 15 years or watch the nightly news and never have a clue that any of this is going on. But you would certainly think, "Well there are a lot of terrorists out there and a heckuva of a lot of crime and corruption." The nightly new is as full of crime as it's ever been, and yet the crime statistics have been going steadily down in the United States. In some cases they are now at a 30-year low, and yet crime still dominates the local news.

So when you bring up stories of social entrepreneurs — people really succeeding in bringing positive change at scale — people often are a bit skeptical initially. But when they get over their skepticism, what follows is often excitement and intense curiosity: because the tremendous growth of social entrepreneurship — which is still fairly new — can cause you to challenge your view that the world is growing more dangerous, or more unjust, and is surely headed in the wrong direction. When they make those judgments, many people are unaware of the fact that there are millions of social entrepreneurs around the world who are building organizations, and that the leading edge of these entrepreneurs are genuinely causing system change.

And when they hear about Ashoka — this organization that has a Fellowship of 1,400 of these social entrepreneurs — each one's story worthy of its own book — and that there are other organizations all around the world also supporting social entrepreneurs — they are suddenly stopped in their tracks.

At that point, some will stop and say something like, "You know, my friend Joe is doing this. I never thought of him as a social entrepreneur, but I guess he is one." Or: "It's funny. I've had this idea in the back of my mind for the last five years and I've always thought about it, but I've never thought I really could do it."

In some cases, they go further: "I have this idea. I've written up a proposal. I even have an Excel spreadsheet with a budget, and I have just been waiting for the right time in my life to go ahead with it." You find people are thinking along these lines but they don't know that there is this movement, like a great ship — the citizen sector — that they can hitch their boats to.

CM: Can anyone be a social entrepreneur?

DB: It can be very daunting to think of yourself as being a social entrepreneur if you compare yourself to the
Photo by Kris Herbst
Bill Drayton Ashoka Founder and Chairman Bill Drayton
Bill Draytons and Muhammad Yunuses of the world. But we have to remember: these guys started very small. Most social entrepreneurs begin with a very simple, unplanned intervention — helping one street kid or one disabled child. Muhammad Yunus started with seven borrowers in a village. Bill Drayton started with two Ashoka fellows in India in 1982. Their work grew incrementally over years. In many cases the world only recognized the organization after several years.

When you look at people who have done remarkable things, you must remember that they didn't begin with the knowledge and capacity to run a large organization. They acquired the capacity along the way, step by step.

In every case, the initial effort was very simple and very straightforward. So, when you look at people who have done remarkable things, you must remember that they didn't begin with the capacity to do what you have seen them doing. Their capacity grew along the way as their vision grew.

One of the great equalizing factors of social entrepreneurship is that the great social entrepreneurs are not the geniuses of society. They are not the best educated or the richest or the most talented. Rather, they tend to be the people who are the most strongly motivated in a particular area.

My research shows that people are great social entrepreneurs when they are very clear and very driven to bring about the positive social change that they want to bring. Most of the things they need to know, they learn along the way. Or they bring in people who can do things that they're not good at.

CM: This kind of single-minded pursuit of a goal must be rare, though.

DB: The people I write about in my book are people who want to transform society, and this is indeed the rare person. They are people who will not stop pushing until they have redefined their field. There are not many people in the world who are that obsessive, that single-minded and that clear about what they want to do. Most people have many other goals in life, and they balance their goals. The social entrepreneurs do not lead well-balanced lives. Everything gets filtered through the prism of their ideas: where to live, who to marry, when to marry, what to read. Everything.

On the other hand, if everyone was a leading social entrepreneur, society probably couldn't function. In every industry or field you have a few leading groups that have redefined that industry or field. But then you also have thousands of people who build other organizations at t
Photo by Kris Herbst
Muhammad Yunus Muhammad Yunus
all levels. Grameen Bank founder Muhammad Yunus is the leading social entrepreneur of microcredit, but he did not start the thousands of microcredit organizations that exist around the world. Each of these organizations was started by a person. Some reach one-hundred people; some reach one hundred thousand.

Every one of those individuals is a social entrepreneur. Although they are working at a different levels, their changes are no less valuable or worthy. You have many different levels at which people can participate in this emerging sector. This is what is so wonderful — because this sector now need the talents of people from all different walks of life with many different temperaments and skills.

Just as not everybody wants to start a business, not everybody wants to start an organization. There are many people out there who love to support social entrepreneurs — they love helping to advocate for them, write about them (like me) or create art about them. I hope to be seeing more of that with television and documentary work, and perhaps even some painting of social entrepreneurs one day! And of course you have the much wider range of people who are skilled in computers, or administration, or communications, or any of the support services that these organizations need to be effective and grow.






Send Social Entrepreneur E-cards to your friends and spread the word about social entrepreneurship!

Postcard

  CM: So what specific first steps would you recommend to someone who is interested in changing the world?

DB: The first thing is to develop a brain trust — people you trust, who have a well-rounded expertise and intelligence. There should be some people who have expertise in the field in which you are working, people who can play devil's advocate, people who are door openers and connectors to circles of power, influence or money.

Then think of your idea as if it's a product and ask yourself, "Is there market for this product?" Although this is basic advice — MBA 101 kind of advice — the social entrepreneurs who are very successful spend a lot of time analyzing the market, and connecting with it. Don't just assume that there is a need. Find out what and who the market is and talk to these people.

Look at who else is doing it. Are they doing it well? You should be able to explain why you are better or different from the other people who are already out there doing it. Not only will that help you to develop your idea, it will help you differentiate yourself when you walk in a funder's door and hear, "Well, why should we fund you when we are already funding somebody else and they have been doing this for five years?" You must have a ready answer.

The third thing is: figure out what resources you will need financially and people-wise. Sketch out the possible actors, partners and the kind of resources you might need as early as possible. Think through the basic operational plan. But beware: trying to over-think at an early stage may be as problematic as not thinking enough, so be open. Take immediate, decisive action toward some small goals to pull a few people in.

CM: Why do you think social entrepreneurs — as individuals and as a profession or social movement — are getting so much attention now?

DB: There are a number of factors. September 11th seems to have had a kind of galvanizing effect. I suspect that after that event, anyone who wanted to do something, or who dreamt about doing something along the lines of social entrepreneurship, either felt a greater sense of urgency or that life is not quite as predictable as we often think it is. And that you should try and do the things that you dream of doing before your time runs out.

People are focused on the global now. At the same time, there is a strong sense now that the government needs a lot of help in dealing with problems. That, in terms of solving problems, the leadership is not coming out of the traditional bureaucratic structures, so social entrepreneurs really see that this is a great personal opportunity for them to do work that is a) exciting, uses their talents effectively and is meaningful, and b) may be a more effective way of addressing a problem than focusing strictly on political processes.

CM: Why is the amount of funding for social entrepreneurs improving?

DB: Organizations that fund this sort of thing are thinking that they need to be a bit more competitive. They can't just go on watering one-thousand flowers and letting them all wither. It's a better strategy to cultivate a garden and selectively chose a smaller number of seeds — then make sure they are well tended and get the resources they need to grow. Social entrepreneurship is really about finding those seeds with the greatest potential.

CM: As we noted earlier, you have taken the "road less traveled" in your life. How have you made a career out of writing about social innovations?

DB: When I look at my life in retrospect, there is a coherence to it, but I never really thought of it as a career. I've been drawn toward writing about these things since I was in high school. When I was in eleventh grade, my English teacher told me that I had an ability to convey ideas clearly and simply, and to help other people understand them. This has always stuck in my mind.

I studied business in college. Even though I didn't want to make a career in the business sector, I always had a sense that understanding how business works would be important. After I graduated, I worked in the private sector to understand how businesses work.

Then I applied to journalism school because I wanted to learn how the media works. I had to write an essay about what I wanted to do in my application letter to New York University. Basically, I wrote that I would like to travel around the world looking for really good stories about things that are going on in the world and bring them home.

A couple of years later, in the early 1990s, I went to Bangladesh to write about the Grameen Bank. That led me to understand what a social entrepreneur is. It was the conclusion of my first book — that we need to support social entrepreneurs like Muhammad Yunus — that led me almost directly into this new book on social entrepreneurship.

CM: Do you see possibilities for your next book at this point?

DB: We just had a little baby, so he's the main focus. But soon I would like to delve in to social entrepreneurship at an even more nuts and bolts level than this book gets into.

CM: Have you considered becoming a social entrepreneur yourself?

DB: Writing this book gave me the privilege of getting to know many different social entrepreneurs, and this has given me an enlarged sense of what I might be able to accomplish in life. Especially about what one can do as an effective communicator.

CM: Can you envision yourself starting a social entrepreneurial organization to pursue this, and if so, what would it look like?

DB: Yes, the mission of this organization would be to help society recognize, finance and celebrate the ideas that are currently on the ground for improving society, but which remain under-financed, under-resourced and under-appreciated. We are at no loss for great ideas, models and solutions. But what is missing are many of the mechanisms — financing, support, and systematic journalistic coverage — that exist in the private sector and allow great business models to go national within a decade or within 15 years.

Part of the challenge is to develop communication mechanisms that highlight and shine a spotlight on these ideas, and an analytical framework that will allow people to recognize their true value. Essentially, this boils down to better marketing.

CM: You have done so much traveling and talking to people since you started to work on this book in 1998. Are there stories that never made it into the book?

DB: I interviewed more than 100 people for this book, and there are just so many great stories that I didn't have a chance to include. One person who sticks in my mind is Agnes Gereb, whom I interviewed in Hungary. She is promoting the idea of natural child birthing in Hungary — making that a viable option for women in that society.

It's not the sort of thing we may think of when we think of the great global challenges that we face: poverty, environmental problems, disease. But I thought that her work is very important. My wife had a natural childbirth, and I think that a society where that option is not available or known, or is even illegal, is not a fully open society just yet. I would have loved to have been able to include her work.

At the other end of the life spectrum, Maria De Lourdes Bráz is dealing with another problem that receives little
Maria De Lourdes Bráz Maria De Lourdes Bráz
attention in Brazil. She is working to help poor families in the favelas (slums) of Rio de Janeiro so they don't have to send their aging parents to state institutions for the elderly.

The problem is pretty simple: the adults in these communities must work and the kids go to school, so there is nobody at home to care for an elderly parent. If the elderly person gets to the point where they need care, the family has no choice but to put the elderly person in an institution where they are usually extremely lonely and unhappy. They may get to see their family only once a month. They tend to get sick and die much more quickly than they would otherwise.

Maria De Lourdes Braz founded her organization in the Cidade de Deus ("City of God") favela in Rio, where they made the movie of the same name. She went to the community and created an adult day care facility in the middle of the favela. She got a house, got people in the community to cook meals, give music lessons, and other things. If you have an elderly parent and nobody is at home to care for this person, you can bring him or her to Casa Santa Anna. They are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., located right in the heart of the favela, close to home.

Maria set up wonderful activities. The food is great. She finds wonderful local chefs who can take a chicken and turn it into 30 meals. Very resourceful people. It's all done at extremely low cost. Most of the services are donated.

Now Maria is trying to do this in other communities. When you think about it, this is such a simple idea and yet it makes such a difference in the lives of these people. They no longer have to live out the end of their lives in isolation in an institution. The humanity of it goes so deep. In my view, when you can provide this, it indicates that you have a truly just and humane society.

So, this is a story about one person who deals with the beginning of life and another one who deals with the end of it. In between, there are many, many other people who similarly are doing very moving work, but unfortunately I couldn't include them in the book. I hope that I'll be able to use these stories in other types of writing — in books or articles.

CM: These are inspiring stories about remarkable successes, but surely aspiring social entrepreneurs must experience some disappointments and hard times.

DB: Most of the stories in the book are about people who are succeeding. They are upbeat stories. But people go through real down periods and struggles when everything looks like it is going dark.

There was a social entrepreneur in Brazil who was going through a really tough time when I met him. He had been defrauded of $40,000, his organization was almost falling apart and he was very depressed. He had lost 30 pounds and was very, very angry with himself because he felt that he had made the mistake that allowed his organization to lose this money.

Since then, this social entrepreneur has resurrected his project and is now doing well with it. But when I met him, he was going through a very bleak period. I wrote about it, but it was cut out of the final version. I want to find another place where I can write about it in depth.

CM: You experienced so much as you prepared this book — were there moments that had an especially strong impact on you?

DB: The single most moving moment I had while writing the book happened while I was working on the story about Erzsébet Szekeres in Hungary, who is described in a chapter in the book. She has created organizations for multiply disabled people across Hungary.

Photo © Janet Jarman
Erzsébet Szekeres and Tibor Erzsébet Szekeres and her son, Tibor

To get a perspective on her work I went to visit a state-run institution outside Budapest. It's the kind of place where people look like the living dead. It's such a horrible place, people are always in their pajamas and they are untended. They walk around like zombies. These are people that have been living in an institution in some cases for decades.

I met a man who was literally kept in a cage. Another was wrapped like a mummy because he kept scratching himself. Another looked like a grasshopper — he was skin and bones. He lay on his bed, knees pulled up to his chest. He just kept vibrating. He was like a skeleton. He was never taken outside. Nobody gave him physical therapy. It conjured up images to me of horrible places where people have done tests on human beings.

Photo © Janet Jarman
State-run institution Inside a state-run institution

Maybe 45 minutes later, I arrived at Erzsébet's center, which is just north of Budapest. I walked in and it was astonishing. It was a sunny day and she has a big atrium. The sun streamed in. I could see a golden wheat field outside.

Photo © Janet Jarman
Szekeres center Erzsébet Szekeres' center north of Budapest

Three disabled people walked straight by me wearing jeans and t-shirts. They were having an animated conversation. You could hear music from radio stations.

I walked around and looked into the workshops and saw people busy at work. There were people eating lunch in the restaurant which looks like a pub. As I was taking notes some guy bumped into me, rolling speakers into the disco.

Photo © Janet Jarman
Workshop Workshop scene

It was so moving because I got a full sense of what a social entrepreneur can do. Create a new world. These people were no less disabled than the people in the state-run institution, but they were treated like human beings. You could understand that if this woman, Erzsébet Szekeres, had never been born, all those people would probably be languishing in institutions. It gave me a sense of the beauty that people can bring into the world.

Go to the Changemakers Library for selected Internet resources about Changing Worlds: Getting Motivated; Getting Started  
Contact:

David Bornstein
E-mail: david@howtochangetheworld.org
Web: www.ashoka.org/news/news_bbook1.cfm


Interview by Kris Herbst, Webmaster for Changemakers.net

  Home Page


español   •   about us   •   contact us   •   judges  •   
Changemakers Web search
Copyright © 2007 Changemakers   •   Legal & Privacy Policy